Mutua Madrid Open · Madrid · Masters 1000 / WTA 1000Mutua Madrid Open · Madrid · Masters 1000 / WTA 1000
Home/Players/Statistical deep dive
40
Matches analysed
20
Top-of-game H2H pairs
172
Career meetings tracked
7d
Rolling window
Section 1 · Service power

Aces per match

The serve-power leaderboard — who is putting unreturnable serves on the board most consistently.

PlayerTourCountryAcesMatchesAces / match
Patrick KypsonATPUSA19119.0
F. ComesanaATP14114.0
M. DammATP13113.0
T. DroguetATP13113.0
Cristian GarinATPChile12112.0
N. BasilashviliATP11111.0
C. RodeschATP10110.0
Zizou BergsATPBelgium10110.0
Marin CilicATPCroatia919.0
Tomas MachacATPCzech Republic919.0
Tatjana MariaWTAGermany919.0
V. GaubasATP818.0
E. NavaATP818.0
A. CharaevaWTA818.0
R. SakamotoATP717.0

Behind the serve

Section 2a · 1st-serve %

Highest 1st-serve percentage

How often the first ball goes in. Above 70% is exceptional, above 60% is professional, sub-50% is in trouble.

PlayerTour1st-serve in% in
Laura SiegemundWTA41/4591.1%
I. BeguWTA40/5375.5%
E. MollerATP65/8774.7%
Adrian MannarinoATP43/5874.1%
Anna BondarWTA52/7173.2%
K. VolynetsWTA76/10671.7%
Mattia BellucciATP37/5271.2%
A. KalininaWTA71/10071.0%
Viktorija GolubicWTA36/5170.6%
S. StephensWTA68/9770.1%
Camila OsorioWTA28/4070.0%
V. GaubasATP90/12969.8%
E. NavaATP44/6369.8%
Daria SnigurWTA67/9669.8%
Damir DzumhurATP34/4969.4%
Section 2b · 1st-serve points won

Best behind the 1st serve (% won)

Of the points where the first serve goes in, how many do they win. The truest measure of serve quality.

PlayerTourWon/Total% won
Patrick KypsonATP53/6482.8%
Marin CilicATP34/4281.0%
R. SakamotoATP64/8080.0%
N. BasilashviliATP51/6479.7%
Marco TrungellitiATP38/4879.2%
Zizou BergsATP37/4877.1%
Cristian GarinATP47/6177.0%
V. GaubasATP69/9076.7%
F. ComesanaATP45/5976.3%
M. DammATP45/6075.0%
E. NavaATP33/4475.0%
Tomas MachacATP42/5773.7%
D. Merida AguilarATP36/4973.5%
T. DroguetATP33/4573.3%
E. MollerATP47/6572.3%
Section 2c · 2nd-serve points won

Best behind the 2nd serve (% won)

The 2nd serve is the variance reducer. Anything above 55% is elite — at the top of the men's game it separates Sinner / Alcaraz / Djokovic from everyone else.

PlayerTourWon/Total% won
D. GalfiWTA21/2875.0%
K. VolynetsWTA20/3066.7%
Marin CilicATP25/3865.8%
T. DroguetATP21/3265.6%
P. Llamas RuizATP17/2665.4%
V. GaubasATP25/3964.1%
D. Merida AguilarATP16/2564.0%
A. CharaevaWTA22/3562.9%
Patrick KypsonATP21/3461.8%
C. RodeschATP16/2661.5%
Tomas MachacATP19/3259.4%
A. KalininaWTA17/2958.6%
N. BasilashviliATP28/4858.3%
Cristian GarinATP18/3158.1%
Zizou BergsATP19/3357.6%

On the return

Section 3a · 1st-return points won

Best returner vs 1st serves

Almost no one wins more than ~30% of their first-return points across a season. The very best touch 33-35% — anything higher is a small-sample outlier.

PlayerTourWon/Total% won
Tamara KorpatschWTA36/7746.8%
Daria SnigurWTA25/5644.6%
A. PavlyuchenkovaWTA28/6344.4%
S. StephensWTA31/7044.3%
E. NavaATP20/4643.5%
P. BadosaWTA26/6043.3%
Liudmila SamsonovaWTA17/4042.5%
K. VolynetsWTA34/8142.0%
Hanne VandewinkelWTA28/6741.8%
A. KalininaWTA28/6741.8%
J. GrabherWTA24/5841.4%
D. GalfiWTA24/5841.4%
Panna UdvardyWTA17/4240.5%
E. KalievaWTA19/4740.4%
Anna BlinkovaWTA23/5839.7%
Section 3b · 2nd-return points won

Best returner vs 2nd serves

Where breaks of serve are made. 55%+ is dominant returning.

PlayerTourWon/Total% won
Jan-Lennard StruffATP20/2676.9%
J. GrabherWTA31/4273.8%
K. QuevedoWTA22/3073.3%
E. KalievaWTA34/4772.3%
Anna BlinkovaWTA27/3871.1%
Yuliia StarodubtsevaWTA30/4369.8%
Daniel Vallejo AdolfoATP19/2867.9%
P. BadosaWTA19/2867.9%
L. JeanjeanWTA21/3363.6%
Daria SnigurWTA19/3063.3%
J. De JongATP28/4562.2%
Rafael JodarATP28/4759.6%
D. Merida AguilarATP16/2759.3%
D. GalfiWTA25/4358.1%
Alejandro TabiloATP15/2657.7%

Pressure-point clutch

Section 4a · Composure

Break points saved % (under pressure)

When the opponent earns a break point, how often does the server escape. Composure metric, minimum 6 break points faced.

PlayerTourSavedSave %
E. MollerATP6/6100.0%
P. Llamas RuizATP6/785.7%
Marco TrungellitiATP5/683.3%
A. CharaevaWTA8/1080.0%
Anna BondarWTA7/977.8%
D. VidmanovaWTA14/1973.7%
Cristian GarinATP5/771.4%
D. GalfiWTA5/771.4%
Panna UdvardyWTA10/1566.7%
R. MasarovaWTA8/1266.7%
L. JeanjeanWTA6/966.7%
Zizou BergsATP4/666.7%
Jan-Lennard StruffATP4/666.7%
Hanne VandewinkelWTA11/1764.7%
T. C. GrantWTA7/1163.6%
Section 4b · Killer instinct

Break points converted % (return pressure)

When the player earns a break point, how often do they take it. Killer-instinct metric, minimum 6 break points won.

PlayerTourConvertedConv %
B. BonziATP5/683.3%
Petra MarcinkoWTA5/683.3%
Anna BlinkovaWTA8/1172.7%
Camila OsorioWTA5/771.4%
Tamara KorpatschWTA5/771.4%
N. Budkov KjaerATP6/966.7%
Peyton StearnsWTA4/666.7%
P. BadosaWTA7/1163.6%
Anna BondarWTA5/862.5%
Jessica Bouzas ManeiroWTA5/862.5%
A. CharaevaWTA4/757.1%
J. GrabherWTA9/1656.2%
E. KalievaWTA9/1656.2%
A. KalininaWTA5/955.6%
Laura SiegemundWTA6/1154.5%

Big-match temperament (last 7 days)

Four pressure-cooker leaderboards built from match-level outcomes in the rolling 7-day window: who survives tiebreaks, who wins deciders, who comes back from a set down, and who hands out the most bagels and breadsticks.

Section 5a · Tiebreak kings

Highest tiebreak win %

Tiebreaks compress the entire match into seven points. Min 2 tiebreaks played in window.

PlayerTourTiebreaksTB win %
Belinda BencicWTA2/2100.0%
Cameron NorrieATP2/366.7%
Arthur FilsATP2/366.7%
Ben SheltonATP1/250.0%
Valentin VacherotATP1/250.0%
Mirra AndreevaWTA1/250.0%
Section 5b · Decider warriors

Win % when matches go the distance

In a best-of-3 a deciding set is a third set; in a best-of-5 it's a fourth or fifth. Pure nerve. Min 2 deciders played.

PlayerTourDecidersDecider win %
Elena RybakinaWTA2/2100.0%
Coco GauffWTA1/250.0%
Section 5c · Comeback wins

Most matches won after losing the first set

Counts wins where the player dropped the opening set. The grind metric.

Section 5d · Bagel & breadstick tracker

Set-level dominance — 6-0s and 6-1s served up

A 'bagel' is a 6-0 set won; a 'breadstick' is a 6-1. Bagels given is how many your opponent left the court with against you.

PlayerTourBagels givenBreadsticks givenBagels taken
Casper RuudATP120
Coco GauffWTA120
Liudmila SamsonovaWTA100
Marta KostyukWTA020
Jannik SinnerATP010
Alexander ZverevATP010
Flavio CobolliATP010
Francisco CerundoloATP010
Luciano DarderiATP010
Aryna SabalenkaWTA010
Section 6 · Rivalries

Top-of-game H2H network

All 10 ATP top-5 vs ATP top-5 and 10 WTA top-5 vs WTA top-5 head-to-head ledgers, sorted by all-time meetings (most-played first). Click through for the full rivalry breakdown.

RivalryTourRecordCareer meetings
Jannik Sinner vs Carlos Alcaraz
#1 · #2
ATP Jannik Sinner 5 – 5 Carlos Alcaraz
5
5
10 View →
Alexander Zverev vs Jannik Sinner
#3 · #1
ATP Alexander Zverev 2 – 8 Jannik Sinner
2
8
10 View →
Novak Djokovic vs Jannik Sinner
#4 · #1
ATP Novak Djokovic 2 – 8 Jannik Sinner
2
8
10 View →
Alexander Zverev vs Carlos Alcaraz
#3 · #2
ATP Alexander Zverev 4 – 6 Carlos Alcaraz
4
6
10 View →
Novak Djokovic vs Carlos Alcaraz
#4 · #2
ATP Novak Djokovic 5 – 5 Carlos Alcaraz
5
5
10 View →
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger-Aliassime
#3 · #5
ATP Alexander Zverev 5 – 5 Felix Auger-Aliassime
5
5
10 View →
Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina
#1 · #2
WTA Aryna Sabalenka 6 – 4 Elena Rybakina
6
4
10 View →
Aryna Sabalenka vs Coco Gauff
#1 · #3
WTA Aryna Sabalenka 6 – 4 Coco Gauff
6
4
10 View →
Iga Swiatek vs Aryna Sabalenka
#4 · #1
WTA Iga Swiatek 5 – 5 Aryna Sabalenka
5
5
10 View →
Iga Swiatek vs Elena Rybakina
#4 · #2
WTA Iga Swiatek 7 – 3 Elena Rybakina
7
3
10 View →
Iga Swiatek vs Coco Gauff
#4 · #3
WTA Iga Swiatek 5 – 5 Coco Gauff
5
5
10 View →
Iga Swiatek vs Jessica Pegula
#4 · #5
WTA Iga Swiatek 6 – 4 Jessica Pegula
6
4
10 View →
Aryna Sabalenka vs Jessica Pegula
#1 · #5
WTA Aryna Sabalenka 7 – 2 Jessica Pegula
7
2
9 View →
Jessica Pegula vs Elena Rybakina
#5 · #2
WTA Jessica Pegula 3 – 6 Elena Rybakina
3
6
9 View →
Jessica Pegula vs Coco Gauff
#5 · #3
WTA Jessica Pegula 6 – 3 Coco Gauff
6
3
9 View →
Jannik Sinner vs Felix Auger-Aliassime
#1 · #5
ATP Jannik Sinner 5 – 2 Felix Auger-Aliassime
5
2
7 View →
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Carlos Alcaraz
#5 · #2
ATP Felix Auger-Aliassime 2 – 5 Carlos Alcaraz
2
5
7 View →
Novak Djokovic vs Alexander Zverev
#4 · #3
ATP Novak Djokovic 4 – 3 Alexander Zverev
4
3
7 View →
Novak Djokovic vs Felix Auger-Aliassime
#4 · #5
ATP Novak Djokovic 2 – 1 Felix Auger-Aliassime
2
1
3 View →
Elena Rybakina vs Coco Gauff
#2 · #3
WTA Elena Rybakina 0 – 1 Coco Gauff
0
1
1 View →

Weekly rank movement

ATP · climbing

ATP climbers (this week)

PlayerCountryRankPoints
Taylor FritzUSA#73,870
Andrey RublevWorld#122,630
Flavio CobolliItaly#132,600
Frances TiafoeUSA#191,965
Learner TienUSA#211,885
Cameron NorrieUnited Kingdom#231,868
Arthur FilsFrance#251,740
Corentin MoutetFrance#301,433
Joao FonsecaBrazil#311,415
Brandon NakashimaUSA#321,385
ATP · sliding

ATP fallers (this week)

PlayerCountryRankPoints
Alex De MinaurAustralia#83,845
Jiri LeheckaCzech Republic#142,540
Casper RuudNorway#152,535
Karen KhachanovWorld#162,220
Francisco CerundoloArgentina#201,920
Luciano DarderiItaly#221,870
Alejandro Davidovich FokinaSpain#241,820
Jakub MensikCzech Republic#271,700
Tallon GriekspoorNetherlands#331,340
Alex MichelsenUSA#371,200
WTA · climbing

WTA climbers (this week)

PlayerCountryRankPoints
Jasmine PaoliniItaly#93,722
Belinda BencicSwitzerland#123,090
Ekaterina AlexandrovaWorld#142,789
Elise MertensBelgium#211,858
Emma NavarroUSA#281,442
Sara BejlekCzech Republic#351,380
Jelena OstapenkoLatvia#401,314
Lois BoissonFrance#461,259
Jessica Bouzas ManeiroSpain#501,186
Tereza ValentovaCzech Republic#511,161
WTA · sliding

WTA fallers (this week)

PlayerCountryRankPoints
Mirra AndreevaWorld#83,746
Karolina MuchovaCzech Republic#113,318
Linda NoskovaCzech Republic#132,849
Liudmila SamsonovaWorld#201,895
Anna KalinskayaWorld#221,813
Marta KostyukUkraine#231,722
Emma RaducanuUnited Kingdom#271,465
Maya JointAustralia#291,435
Cristina BucsaSpain#301,426
Xinyu WangChina#311,401
Caveats

Reading these numbers

  • The window covers a single tournament cycle (~1 week). Strong serve numbers from a player who has only played at altitude in Madrid will look gaudier than they would on grass at Queen's.
  • Match-quality is uneven: a player thrashing qualifiers in early rounds pads their averages.
  • Surface-specific splits would require a longer window — we are deliberately conservative because the API plan only retains a rolling few weeks of fixture statistics.
  • Doubles is excluded — these are singles-only metrics. See the ATP and WTA doubles rankings for team form.
  • The page is regenerated every build from the live api-tennis.com feed.